Middle English Dresshold, from Old English Threscwald like the Old Norse threskjǫldr threshold, Old English has defeated a question of substance, as opposed to a question of form, with regard to pleadings, affidavits, indictments and other legal instruments, implies the essential sufficiency, validity or merit of the instrument, as opposed to its method or style. The first known use of «threshold» in the English language comes from the Old English translation of Alfred the Great`s De consolatione philosophiae by the Roman philosopher Boethius. In this translation, written around 888, «threshold» appears as «þeorscwold» (this first letter is called a thorn and was used in Old and Middle English to display the sounds produced by «th» in «thin» and «this»). The origins of this old English word are not known, although it is believed to be related to the Old English «threscan», from which we get the words dresh, which means «to separate the seeds of (a harvested plant) with a machine or tool» and «thrash», which means, among other things, «can beat solidly with a stick or whip». (lim-in-nay) n. Latin for «threshold», a request made at the beginning of a trial requiring the judge to decide that certain evidence cannot be introduced into the trial. This is more common in criminal trials where evidence is subject to constitutional restrictions, such as statements made without Miranda warnings (reading the rights of the suspect). before the 12th century, in the sense defined in the sense 1 1. The border, if it is crossed, has a different state of affairs. 2. A maximum or minimum value that serves as a reference point to compare and guide any violation that may lead to a situation review or system redesign.
Be; the necessary material or component of something. Theme music by Joshua Stamper ©2006 New Jerusalem Music/ASCAP SUBSTANCE, evidence. What is essential; It is used as opposed to form. 2. The general rule is that, in each question, it is sufficient to prove its content. For example, in a case where the defendant claimed payment of the principal and all interest due and was found to be proof that a gross amount was paid that did not correspond to the full interest but was accepted by the plaintiff as full payment, the evidence was considered sufficient. 2 Str. 690; 1 Phil. Ev. 161.